There can be no doubt that the Internet has been the most revolutionary invention of the 20th century. Never before has a human invention given so much freedom to so many people: digital access to information of all kind everywhere in the world. Today, more people get their news from the Internet than from newspapers; young people are watching more online video than broadcast TV; everyone can develop their own blogs and let the world know abut their lives, thoughts and opinions.
However, it seems that the Internet as we know it today has its days numbered. Over the next few years we are going to witness several attempts to gag the Net. But, wait a second… We live in a free world, don’t we? Well, sort of, given that if you want to start your own radio or TV station you will have to ask your government for the corresponding license. And yet, today anybody can create a blog, or start an online radio or TV station to voice their opinions without needing to ask anybody’s permission… Isn’t it just intolerable? 😉
But there is more… People are using the Internet to coordinate protests against repressive regimes, and social networking sites like Twitter show the power of the Internet, a place where you can hear other people’s voices and they can hear yours.
Governments are scared. Very scared. Traditional dictatorships have always known how ‘dangerous’ the Internet is, censoring its contents. However, other so-called ‘democratic’ governments famous for shutting down critical radio and TV stations sometimes opt for more subtle methods: for example, the gag law passed in December 2010 by the Venezuelan parliament to restrict, limit and criminalize contents and the free exchange of information.
In 2011 we have seen many examples of governments’ attempts to eradicate this problem once and for all like, for example, when former Egyptian dictator Hosni Mubarak shut down the country’s Internet connection and mobile phone network. A few days later he was forced to step down as president. Even some Western governments have started to consider the possibility of having a ‘kill switch’ to shut down the Internet at will, with the excuse of protecting the country against cyber-attacks.
The issue of freedom vs. security is in everybody’s mouth, and a majority of people believe it is worth giving up some individual rights in exchange for security. Benjamin Franklin expressed his view of the issue many years ago:
“People willing to trade their freedom for temporary security deserve neither and will lose both”
Today many people unfortunately don’t even know who Benjamin Franklin was. What’s more, many of them are very happy to trade their own freedom in exchange for a certain sense of security (whether real or not, the important thing is to think that you are safe). Moreover, if those taking your liberties from you have been democratically elected, then people are more than happy to accept it.
Governments even go as far as saying that any limitations on people’s liberties aren’t actually that, but they are giving citizens more liberty by protecting their security. This is nonsense. However, anybody that listens to 100 99 percent (let’s keep the hope alive) of politicians, however democratic they may seem, will see that their strategy is always similar: They all try to justify themselves by stating that they restrict our liberties to give us more freedom.
On February 15, 2011, Hillary Clinton gave a speech on the Internet, freedom and security at George Washington University. She praised the steps taken to protect global Internet freedom against its enemies -expressly mentioning countries like China, Vietnam, Burma, Egypt, Tunisia and Iran-, and explained how people in those countries were using the Internet to fight their authoritarian governments.
She also reaffirmed the U.S government’s will to defend Internet freedom, and pointed out the following as well:
“Terrorists and extremist groups use the internet to recruit members, and plot and carry out attacks. Human traffickers use the internet to find and lure new victims into modern-day slavery. Child pornographers use the internet to exploit children. Hackers break into financial institutions, cell phone networks and personal email accounts.”
She then went on to say that Internet freedom was a foreign policy priority, although a balance had to be found between liberty and security, this being one of the most important challenges to face over the next few years.
Once we have reached this point I think it is a good idea to quote Lenin’s opinion about freedom in order to avoid past mistakes:
“It is true that liberty is precious, so precious that it must be carefully rationed.”
And that’s exactly the key point. We must stay forever vigilant in preserving our liberties from politicians wanting to control them in the name of security.
If we say that the Internet has no frontiers and laws are designed to prevail over the concept of territory, we are not saying anything new or original. But if we combine those two ideas together and try to apply laws, regulations or any other system that limits or restricts access, freedom of speech or opinion exchange on such a democratic and egalitarian entity as the Internet things start to get complicated.
Besides, it doesn’t work. If authorities temporarily shut down all Internet access in a country, it will only cause more information diffusion and virality. Therefore, if they gave it a second though, they would realize that these measures are actually counterproductive.
So, while governments waste their time worrying about people posting negative comments on forums and online communities or uploading videos to YouTube, citizens have to deal with real problems like online fraud, and thousands of cyber-criminals make a fortune thanks to the lack of any cooperative efforts to uncover and arrest them.
It would seem that governments’ main concern is to limit Internet freedom in order to protect us… Well, really? I am absolutely convinced that that is NOT the case.
All this will eventually change the Internet as we currently know it… for worse at least when it comes to freedom of speech. In a few years’ time, besides protecting ourselves against cyber-attacks we will also have to look for mechanisms that guarantee our rights against government abuse of power. Some people are talking about the introduction of “Internet passports” to identify Internet users. This idea, widely applauded by some security experts, is sincerely nonsensical if not completely ridiculous. Does anybody really think that the existence of passports actually prevents crime, or that not having a driver’s license is going to keep some people from driving? The aim of this measure is to have people under control at all times.
Today our fight for freedom is more important than ever. Nobody should have the power to limit our freedom in the name of security. Whether I am right or wrong, what I truly want is to have the right to choose freely, even if it is just to make a mistake.
May 27th, 2011 at 12:50 pm
Good post. 🙂 Not much to add to this really, just hope you’ll continue to write on this blog.
May 27th, 2011 at 12:52 pm
I have some ideas, the main issue is finding some time to do it 🙂
May 27th, 2011 at 12:58 pm
Hehe, that’s why I expressed my hopes. I keep a handful of different blogs. All in my head. Just never find the time to actually write them. 🙂
May 27th, 2011 at 5:20 pm
It seems welve found a point to actually agree on 🙂 great post!
GL with the new blog!
//Daniel
May 27th, 2011 at 6:11 pm
No worries, I’ll find some point we can disagree on 😉
May 27th, 2011 at 10:36 pm
A blog for my Speed Dial.
Nice blog idea Luis.
May 28th, 2011 at 3:13 pm
[…] and All this will eventually change the Internet as we currently know it… for worse at least when it comes to freedom of speech. In a few years’ time, besides protecting ourselves against cyber-attacks we will also have to look for mechanisms that guarantee our rights against government abuse of power. Freedom vs Security […]
May 30th, 2011 at 2:37 pm
Great piece luis. The worst reality that we have to face is that not everyone can be let free to roam. That’s when security or control is a must. What, how, where to implement is a difficult question to answer, at least they are trying to do something. But as we have seen there are no perfect person/s to make the decisions on what to do. So the dilema begins…
One way is to invent an anti-arsehole pill or a jack-ass vacination. Sa la vie
May 30th, 2011 at 3:39 pm
Thank you very much for your comment Melvin. We are all aware that we live in a “World Wild Web”, but that should never justify to restrict our freedom. There are many things that can be done to improve security that do not imply eroding our rights. There are laws, and maybe more should be created, but the most important ones are those that will protect the citizens from their governments 😉
May 30th, 2011 at 3:53 pm
I agree, freedom is a wiseman’s wings to fly and explore and should not be clipped. We pay the government’s salary, they should really start listening to the people and not some advisor who doesn’t really know the real world. People create the world we live in, world where we escape (the internet), they can also create a world were there is a balance. I sound like a politician maybe I can get a job as an advisor hahahahahahhaa…..
May 31st, 2011 at 10:31 am
[…] neutralidad de la red. Kevin Townsend habló sobre ello recientemente en respuesta a mi artículo Freedom vs Security […]
May 31st, 2011 at 10:32 am
[…] going on about net neutrality. Kevin Townsend talked about that recently in an answer to my Freedom vs Security […]
May 31st, 2011 at 11:10 am
Nice blog Luis!
Ok, but I don’t agree with the voices that claim Internet should be regulated as it is done with traditional media. TV and radio licenses are regulated because of the lack of broadcast space, there are roads for the signals you must pay for. In Internet this is not the same case.
Of course the Internet Passports are probably the best way to control the good citizens in the Net. But is a nonsense when fighting against bad guys, as they use hoods in the real life robberies and they will use fake ID’s in virtual life…
As you stated, such type of extreme controls as “Internet Red Switches” could just avoid an immediate problem for a while (as Mubarack did when he pressed the Vodafone switch) but this immature behaviour doesn’t work at all. So they will search for “better” switches. But you know what happens in computer security world. As soon as you got solutions for today troubles, there are new troubles that overlapped them! 😉
I mean, Internet is just the first step, a new revolution is comming on 😉
May 31st, 2011 at 11:21 am
Thanks Arri. Nothing else to add, I completely agree with you 🙂
May 31st, 2011 at 11:25 am
[…] going on about net neutrality. Kevin Townsend talked about that recently in an answer to my Freedom vs Security […]
May 31st, 2011 at 12:58 pm
[…] recently in an answer to my Freedom vs Security […]
June 1st, 2011 at 8:31 am
Thanks for the article. For info on people using voluntary Libertarian tools on this issue, please see http://www.Libertarian-International.org the Libertarian International Organization.
June 8th, 2011 at 2:39 pm
[…] post in The Official Google Blog and wanted to share it with you as it is related to my previous Freedom vs Security […]
October 20th, 2011 at 1:03 am
Hi Luis
really enjoyed reading this blog and hearing your opinions. Absolutely spot on.
Not sure of the solution though.. Politicians feel that they are responsible for peoples security and are frightened of getting in trouble and being responsible when anything awry does happen. Therefore their reaction is to barricade everyone into a safe padded room where nothing can go wrong.
April 11th, 2013 at 10:12 pm
Everything is very open with a really clear explanation of the issues.
It was truly informative. Your website is useful. Many thanks for sharing!
May 6th, 2013 at 10:30 am
Ahaa, its fastidious conversation regarding this paragraph here
at this blog, I have read all that, so at this time me also commenting here.
May 13th, 2014 at 10:14 am
[…] going on about net neutrality. Kevin Townsend talked about that recently in an answer to my Freedom vs Security […]
February 29th, 2020 at 2:30 pm
купить вх для ксго – вх для Apex Legends, вх для кс 1.6